🔗 Share this article

I possess some thoughts about that remarks delivered by the sports network commentator a well-known announcer following Novak Djokovic's win over Taylor Fritz in the US Open last eight. Look – the athlete represents the United States, the commentator is from the US – and athletic competitions frequently encourage nationalism. Some letdown was appropriate. Instead, Fowler brought up the ongoing absence of American men at the majors: none of them has won a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the competition.

Everyone love a storyline, myself included. But really. Suppose Fritz had beaten Djokovic for the initial occasion, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the next round, who Fritz has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And if he’d someway gotten past that, it would have been title holder the Italian, versus him the American had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. The two young stars had also split the last seven major titles (plus the Spaniard proceeded to thrash a tired Djokovic in the next round). Fritz stated in post-match interviews following his defeat that he in fact preferred his path, because it offered the chance to beat the top three players in the sport back-to-back. Fritz is more than justified to aspire to the accomplishment; an competitor is meant to have faith in themselves. But going into that Djokovic last eight match who else in their right mind had the drought of US winners in mind?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the only thing standing in her way and sustained success

Fritz, twenty-eight, is placed number four in the world starting this week’s ATP World Tour Finals and has won his previous six matches over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. It's likely he could claim that position for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that right now, that is as far as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard lie a vast gap of ranking points away. His top-class serve and powerful strength on each forehand and reverse side are sufficiently enough to dispose of most opponents on the professional circuit. Against the handful of once-in-a-lifetime players, though, Fritz is frequently overmatched. The past few years has seen the curious emergence of lanky, towering athletes who can nonetheless cover the court with the alarming quickness and grace of smaller players. He is six-foot-five and appears that way. His footwork is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he seldom steal a point that the other player was controlling, and hitting a soft shot versus him is typically a reliable tactic. That serves as a quite severe limitation on his upside.

Fritz has achieved a several significant, unexpected advancements throughout his career. Early on of the decade, he was hovering around the bottom of the top 30. Two years after, he was approaching the top 10. Last year, he suddenly surged to No 4 – and held the position. But the subsequent step, competing against and defeating legendary figures like Alcaraz, Sinner, and including a aging Djokovic, is the highest of all. What could Fowler have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the continuing slump of American men lifting major titles when Fritz had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply excessive and the appreciation for the magnitude of the challenge insufficient.

Taylor Fritz made a personal best advancement to the All England Club semi-finals in the summer.

Fritz’s performance in that exact quarter-final ought to have been sufficient of an indication. The Serbian won in four sets, a win that only seemed tenuous for brief periods towards the conclusion, when Fritz had survived a few championship opportunities and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair appeared evenly matched during the rallies, with Fritz earning numerous opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But the champion saved service break opportunity after service break opportunity, prolonging the run to the brink of frustration. When he eventually did claim one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately played a terrible service game to drop serve once more; Djokovic had lulled him into a skirmish secondary to the main contest and forced him to use far too much energy to win it. Facing set points in the final game, Fritz’s primary delivery floated to the sky. He prolonged the match two times on his backup delivery, but finally double-faulted. It was not a choke, I didn’t think, just a result of having to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The match was quite compelling evidence that Fritz is not good enough to defeat any version of the Serbian, who was defeated by Alcaraz in the following match and did not especially seem like he thought he could win. This is perfectly acceptable – Djokovic is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the height of his athletic abilities anymore, but has acquired sufficient experience and strategic intelligence to make up for quite a bit of the drop-off. The issue is the individuals who were expecting Fritz to prevail, and pressuring him to do so, when he was yet to accomplished anything that suggested he could.

The American is an asset to the tour nonetheless. He’s a calm, reflective presence in media sessions, more so than almost anyone on the ATP aside from the Russian star, prepared to not only express how he feels or the tactic he believed determined a contest, but explain it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the responsibility for America failing to produce a male major champion since Andy Roddick feels unjust. (Now that Ben Shelton is competing alongside him in the rankings, maybe they can divide that burden.)

ATP Finals: Player Divisions

Jimmy Connors Group

• The Spanish phenom
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Group

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• The German powerhouse
• Ben Shelton (US)
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely think about it indefinitely if I don’t do it,” the American informed an interviewer in the summer of claiming a major. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not a failure if he does not fulfill that goal, that breaking through the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable empire is actually highly unlikely for everybody else. {